Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
Advantages and Disadvantages for each IPsec solution |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#IPsec solutions | #IPsec solutions Racoon2 Libreswan Strongswan. | ||
##1.Racoon2: | ##1.Racoon2: | ||
**Advantages: | **Advantages: | ||
- Lightweight and easy to use with minimal CPU/RAM usage, compared to other solutions | - Lightweight and easy to use with minimal CPU/RAM usage, compared to other solutions. | ||
- Native on FreeBSD | - Native on FreeBSD. | ||
- Simple configuration for point-to-point. | - Simple configuration for point-to-point. | ||
Revision as of 12:49, 9 February 2026
- IPsec solutions Racoon2 Libreswan Strongswan.
- 1.Racoon2:
- Advantages:
- Lightweight and easy to use with minimal CPU/RAM usage, compared to other solutions. - Native on FreeBSD. - Simple configuration for point-to-point.
- Disadvantages:
- Project not actively maintained, last update was in 2020. - Limited support for modern features (IKEv2, NAT traversal), configuration is possible but may be more complex than others solutions. - Apple clients can have difficulty connecting because of the limitations of pfkeyv2 interface to the linux kernel that racoon2 uses. - Harder to configure for complex setups.
- 2.Libreswan:
- Advantages:
- Actively maintained and stable on older hardware - IRC community. - Support NAT traversal, IKEv2 and enterprise VPN.
- Disadvantages:
- Less native support on FreeBSD. - heavier on ressource usage. - might need kernel patches.
- 3.Strongswan:
- Advantages:
- Modern and actively maintained. - Full support for IKEv2, EAP, PKI and Mobike - Well documented with community support. - Native of FreeBSD and Linux.
- Disadvantages:
- More complex to configure than racoon2 and libreswan. - Slightly heavier on ressources
- Summary:
- Racoon2: easier to configure for basic setups but it is a deprecated project
- Libreswan: stable and maintained but less native on FreeBSD, might need kernel patches.
- Strongswan: Most modern solution with good documentation and community supports more protocols than the other solutions but might be more complex to configure and is heavier than others solutions
