GRE tunnel

IPsec solutions

1. IPsec solutions Racoon2 Libreswan Strongswan.

1. Racoon2:

Advantages

• Lightweight and easy to use with minimal CPU/RAM usage, compared to other solutions.
• Native on FreeBSD.
• Simple configuration for point-to-point.

• Disadvantages:
• Project not actively maintained, last update was in 2020.
• Limited support for modern features (IKEv2, NAT traversal), configuration is possible but may be more complex than others solutions.
• Apple clients can have difficulty connecting because of the limitations of pfkeyv2 interface to the linux kernel that racoon2 uses.
• Harder to configure for complex setups.

2. Libreswan:

• • Advantages:
• Actively maintained and stable on older hardware
• IRC community.
• Support NAT traversal, IKEv2 and enterprise VPN.

• • Disadvantages:
• Less native support on FreeBSD.
• heavier on ressource usage.
• might need kernel patches.

3. Strongswan:

• Advantages:

• Modern and actively maintained.
• Full support for IKEv2, EAP, PKI and Mobike
• Well documented with community support.
• Native of FreeBSD and Linux.

• Disadvantages:

• More complex to configure than racoon2 and libreswan.
• Slightly heavier on ressources

1. Summary:

• • Racoon2: easier to configure for basic setups but it is a deprecated project
  • Libreswan: stable and maintained but less native on FreeBSD, might need kernel patches.
  • Strongswan: Most modern solution with good documentation and community supports more protocols than the other solutions but might be more complex to configure and is heavier than others solutions